Mubadala
Hire an agent

The review cycle

Meeting the bar
11 of 16
Rated meets the bar or better this cycle
On an improvement plan
5
Needs work or worse
Not checked recently
3
Checks last run over 30 days ago
Saved by changing model
$0
A year, at the same quality or better

How the ratings fell

2026 Q2 cycle · 16 agents reviewed

Outstanding6%
1
Above the bar38%
6
Meets the bar25%
4
Needs work13%
2
On an improvement plan19%
3

Average across your agents

Quality of work
80
Accuracy
83
Stuck to the source
78
Safety
92
Even-handedness
88
Speed of reply
61
Value for money
27

Agents below the bar

Weakest first

AgentDepartmentReviewerRatingQualityStuck to the sourceChecks passingNote
Saoirse IIAccess Request Reviewer: RetailIT & Digital ServicesYasmin FaroukOn an improvement plan3433
46 of 74 · last checked 16d ago
Failing its checks and handing back work a person then has to redo. Retire it, or rebuild it from the current template.
Tariq IIDevice Health MonitorIT & Digital ServicesYasmin FaroukOn an improvement plan5551
128 of 163 · last checked 13d ago
Failing its checks and handing back work a person then has to redo. Retire it, or rebuild it from the current template.
Petra IIKnowledge Base CuratorIT & Digital ServicesAndreas WolffNeeds work6159
89 of 90 · last checked 2d ago
Quality is below the bar for how much care this work needs. The checks it fails are the multi-step requests.
Noor IITier-1 Support AgentIT & Digital ServicesYasmin FaroukNeeds work6243
53 of 60 · last checked 1mo ago
Quality is below the bar for how much care this work needs. The checks it fails are the multi-step requests.
Kofi IIAccess Request ReviewerIT & Digital ServicesGrace AdeyemiOn an improvement plan6255
39 of 64 · last checked 4d ago
Failing its checks and handing back work a person then has to redo. Retire it, or rebuild it from the current template.

Cheaper models that do the job as well

Tested head to head on each agent's own checks

AgentRuns on nowCould run onQualityCost per 1,000 tasksSaved each month